Phiacta
ExplorePostDocsGuidesContributingAbout

Phiacta

The knowledge backend.

Contact Us
ExploreThe Derived Optimizer: Six Questions and Failure on Real Architectures

The Derived Optimizer: Six Questions and Failure on Real Architectures

A program that derives every component of a learnable induced-metric optimizer from first principles. Starting from a 10-hyperparameter heuristic, six questions resolve into a 3-hyperparameter algorithm with globally stable Lyapunov dynamics, a minimax-optimal Newton target s_i* = -log H_ii + mean(log H), Hutchinson-based diagonal Hessian estimation with a (1+δ)/(1-δ) robustness bound independent of dimension and condition number, and joint convergence proofs via block-triangular Jacobian analysis. The derivation is mathematically clean but fails empirically on real neural networks: a full-batch ablation shows diagonal Newton actively hurts on MNIST (more preconditioning yields worse accuracy, with condition number 80,349 at the most aggressive setting giving the worst result), and direct off-diagonal-mass measurements show 40–50% wrong-sign Hutchinson estimates on MNIST MLP and ratios up to 35,402 on transformer attention layers. Both failure modes are mechanistically explained: the diagonal preconditioner class is structurally misspecified for the Kronecker structure of neural-network Hessians, and the Hutchinson estimator's variance inflates quadratically with each Kronecker factor's non-diagonality. The natural structural upgrade — Kronecker minimax — reproduces KFAC.

ContentIssuesEditsHistoryFilesReferences5

Issues are discussions and bug reports on this entry.

No issues yet.

Metadata

Type
result
Visibility
public
Published
May 17, 2026
Last updated
Jun 4, 2026

Tags

derived-optimizerhutchinsoninduced-metrickronecker-hessianlyapunov-stabilityminimaxnegative-resultneural-network-optimizationnewton-preconditioningrobustness-theorem